Friday, January 15, 2010

Black Lamb and Grey Falcon


Pardon me if I do a little bragging here, but I would just like to announce that I've now finished reading a really long book: Rebecca West's Black Lamb and Grey Falcon.

How long a book is it? My single-volume edition is 1150 pages.

What makes the book so long? The book is a record of the author's six-week journey through much of Yugoslavia in 1937, including her reflections on everybody she met and everything she saw, and just about everything that popped into her head--with lots of historical background. What preoccupied West most during her travels--and what drew her attention to the Balkans in the first place--was the political situation in Europe. West could sense a new world war in the offing, and was writing to warn her British audience of the imminent threat from the Nazis and Fascists. The danger posed by Germany and Italy colors much of her account. For instance, many reviewers have remarked on her nearly pathological hatred of everything German, Austrian, or Italian. She does not encounter a single good German in the book, except for some of the (dead) classic German authors and composers. This bias is understandable, given the time when she was writing, but does become tiresome after a while (especially for a Germanophile like myself). This bias perhaps also explains why she does not bother visiting Slovenia--that region of the former Yugoslavia was the closest geographically and culturally to Austria and Italy.

Moreover, her love of everything Serbian seems misguided in light of the civil war in the 1990's, though again it is understandable, given that at the time a strong Kingdom of Yugoslavia under the direction of the Serbs might have slowed down Hitler and Mussolini. The best characters in the book are Serbs, but she also seems blind to the faults of individual Serbs. Did Gavrilo Princip's assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand cause problems? Of course, World War I was a disaster! West nevertheless writes in glowing terms of the young terrorist, even lamenting the poor treatment he received in prison (the Austrians did not execute him because he was under 21). West also seems to be in constant search of the "Slavic essence," which she finds in the proud, indomitable, yet mystical Serbs.

The root of these skewed views is most likely her basically Romantic outlook. The quest for national and ethnic "essences" seems quintessentially Romantic. However, one would think that some German Romantics' obsession with "authentic Germanness" would have cured West of this sloppy habit of thought. She further reveals her Romantic attitudes in her "orientalist" treatment of the Turks. Her description of the savage, yet sensuous and urbane Turks sounds like it came straight out of 1,001 Nights. Finally, she focuses--like a good Romantic--on the "magical" element in religion. I nearly put the book down during the chapters devoted to Ohrid, when she kept using the word "magic" to describe the liturgy in Serbian Orthodox monasteries (picture right).

Besides tracing some of the ethnic tensions at work in pre-war Yugoslavia, West also sought to trace the underlying spiritual causes of the European crisis between the world wars, which she locates in the black lamb and grey falcon of the title. (I was more than 800 pages into the book before I found out what the black lamb referred to, and more than 900 pages in before I came across the poem about the grey falcon.) Europeans of all religions and ethnic groups--Christians, Jews, and Muslims; Serbs, Croats, Gypsies, and Albanians--are obsessed with death, and trying to bring good out of death, especially through bloody sacrifice. She even alleges that the Christian doctrine out of the Atonement is a result of this misguided urge. Her case is not convincing, and comes across as a confused, quasi-Freudian analysis of Thanatos.

But, here is the real question: Given all the book's flaws, why did I insist on finishing it? Am I just a glutton for punishment? First, West is a wonderful writer, with a true talent for description. For example, she meets a landlady in Montenegro who is a rather stern, majestic widow, and remarks that the landlady's husband seemed "specially dead." Second, despite all the disagreements I had with her, I must admit that West often raises good questions. She may not be answering these questions correctly, but at least she is asking them. In a way, she reminds me of Faust, who must err as long as she keeps striving, and is therefore saved in the critic's eyes. Finally, this is a travel book, and a good travel book is a lot of fun. This book let me imagine that I was taking a six-week journey (because that's the time it takes to finish the book) with a friendly, intelligent author, and discussing politics, history, and culture with her. Any travel book that can achieve that is worth reading.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh how you have misunderstood the book, and allowed your interpretation of West's account to be colored by the events of the 1990's...

West's attitude towards the Germans and especially Austrians is definitely subjective, yet she doesn't shy from argumenting it. The same holds for her feelings towards the Serbs.

Being a stouch liberal, she rightfully despized evil empires... and the unrepenting Austro-Hungarian one was evil as they come.

And weren't her warnings on Nazi Germany prescient.. all while her government pursued a policy of appeasment towards it?

As for the Serbs: is it so hard to understand that she admired a young peasant country, which only a few years after ridding itself of 500 years of Ottoman oppresion, sacrificed 1/3rd (!) of its population in the fight against such evil empires?

..Rebecca West was, in all matters she wrote about (least of all her writing on Yugoslavia, look them up) a fearless intellectual willing to go against the grain, even if this meant debasing her 'natural' supporters.

I'm sorry to say that less can be said of you... and I bet she would agree with me.

Stephen said...

Anonymous,

There is no doubt that West saw the evils of Nazism more clearly than did the British government. And again, there is no doubt that the Serbs exhibited great courage in their struggle for independence.

My main point, though, in bringing up more recent history was to show the danger of glorifying any nation in West's rather Romantic fashion. West's attitude toward the Germans and Austrians was not merely subjective, but rather so blinded by certain prejudices that she ended up being unjust in her judgments. I wonder whether, if West had been writing in the 1990s, she would have demonized the Serbs and exalted the Bosnians or the Kosovars.

In other words, West's fault is that she tends to paint every ethnic group in history either black and white. It is certainly not wrong for the historian to make moral judgments; what's wrong is to make one group the good guys for all times and the other group the bad guys for all times, and to ignore the good and the bad that is in everyone.

Anonymous said...

I understood that point, however I'm not sure how pro Kosovo independence West would have been. She, most of all Western authors I have consulted on the topic, understoood why Kosovo was, and is, sacred for the Serbs.

I do agree that the travesty of the most recent Balkan wars would have been the worst of disappointments to her.. She was in this sense 'lucky' not to have witnessed it herself.

However, what I didn't articulate in my previous post was that West, unlike most modern commenters recognized the Croats, the Serbs, the Slovenese and Bosniaks as South Slavs, above all. What she saw was beautiful diversity within the same people, and that the animosity which did exist was the result of religious and historical scars, inflicted mostly by foreign powers.

Unfortunately enough, the Western media were all to eager to exaggerate these differences, and support local chauvinists like Milosevic and Tudjman (the former indirectly, and the latter directly), whose only aim was to create their own place in 'history'. Milosevic utterly failed, but Tudjman, who was as much a criminal as Milosevic, seems to have gotten away with it.

I know many Yugoslavs who grew up in 'exile', and all of them (that is, the ones with some brains between their ears) agree with West's perspective...

...it is truly tragic that it is their own 'leaders' who managed to succeed, where centuries of foreign opression failed.

I think that West would agree that this is the (tragic) nature of the Slav. A sad history indeed.